<system>
	<name>HIP 13044</name>
	<rightascension>02 47 37.4431</rightascension>
	<declination>-36 06 27.0322</declination>
	<distance>701</distance>
	<star>
		<mass>0.8</mass>
		<radius>6.7</radius>
		<magV>9.94</magV>
		<magB errorminus="0.028" errorplus="0.028">10.426</magB>
		<magR errorminus="0.023" errorplus="0.023">9.818</magR>
		<magI errorminus="0.03" errorplus="0.03">9.37</magI>
		<magJ errorminus="0.026" errorplus="0.026">8.849</magJ>
		<magH errorminus="0.055" errorplus="0.055">8.586</magH>
		<magK errorminus="0.021" errorplus="0.021">8.512</magK>
		<metallicity>-2.09</metallicity>
		<spectraltype>F2</spectraltype>
		<planet>
			<name>HIP 13044 b</name>
			<name>Gaia DR2 5049085217270417152 b</name>
			<name>TYC 7017-765-1 b</name>
			<list>Controversial</list>
			<mass>1.25</mass>
			<period>16.2</period>
			<semimajoraxis>0.116</semimajoraxis>
			<eccentricity>0.25</eccentricity>
			<discoverymethod>RV</discoverymethod>
			<lastupdate>14/01/05</lastupdate>
			<description>According to a new paper by Jones and Jenkins, a reanalysis of the original data shows no evidence for this planet. It is therefore listed as controversial.</description>
			<discoveryyear>2010</discoveryyear>
			<temperature>2011.0</temperature>
		</planet>
		<name>HIP 13044</name>
		<name>Gaia DR2 5049085217270417152</name>
		<name>TYC 7017-765-1</name>
		<temperature>6025.0</temperature>
	</star>
	<constellation>Fornax</constellation>
</system>
